Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:52:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:51:54 -0400 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org ([204.107.140.52]:49162 "HELO twinlark.arctic.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:51:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 08:51:43 -0700 (PDT) From: dean gaudet To: Justin Guyett cc: , Subject: Re: laptops and journalling filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-comment: visit http://arctic.org/~dean/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Justin Guyett wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Tony Lill wrote: > > > Do any of the current batch of journalling filesystems NOT diddle the > > disk every 5 seconds? I've tried reiser and ext3 and they're both > > antithetic to spinning down the disk. Any plans to fix this bug in > > future kernels? > > are you sure this is a product of the journal and not the vm? a machine > with 1gig memory doing nothing (<25% physmem used) and ext2 has disk > accesses ever few minutes too. that's not my experience. i use noatime, i've disabled atd and selected crontab entries, and i've got enough RAM to avoid paging. the disk will stay spinned down for hours (usually until i touch netscape). the system is based on redhat 6.1 (2.2 kernel). -dean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/