Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750817AbVJCKHl (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2005 06:07:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750824AbVJCKHl (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2005 06:07:41 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:6668 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750817AbVJCKHk (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2005 06:07:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:07:31 +0100 From: Russell King To: Denis Vlasenko Cc: vikas gupta , bcrl@kvack.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.13-rc6-xx-all.diff is not working for 2.6.13 arm kernel Message-ID: <20051003100731.GB16717@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Denis Vlasenko , vikas gupta , bcrl@kvack.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20051003092208.96452.qmail@web8401.mail.in.yahoo.com> <200510031227.34961.vda@ilport.com.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200510031227.34961.vda@ilport.com.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1515 Lines: 38 On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:27:34PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > On Monday 03 October 2005 12:22, vikas gupta wrote: > > hi ben , > > > > I tried to apply 2.6.13-rc6-B0/B1-all.diff to > > linux-2.6.13 kernel with arm support patches . It's > > getting applied cleanly... > > but while building the kernel i am getting some build > > errors ... > > i traced the problem and get that this error are > > coming because of some machine specific files. > > 1)arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c > > 2)include/asm-i386/seamphore.h > > > > So can you please tell me that whather any patch is > > available, in order to support these implementation on > > arm platform. > > How nice that you did not show the actual error message > and did not show your .config That's usual in the embedded world - it's a way that embedded folk seem to write their bug reports to provoke a "response" (the content of the response doesn't seem to matter, just as long as there is one.) However, one also has to wonder - "2.6.13 kernel with arm support patches" "arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c". Why have "arm" patches been applied (and what were they) and why i386 is being built. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/