Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:15:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:15:32 -0400 Received: from atlrel2.hp.com ([156.153.255.202]:62955 "HELO atlrel2.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:15:23 -0400 Message-ID: <3B66D9B9.A01685AB@fc.hp.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 10:15:53 -0600 From: Khalid Aziz X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Linux kernel development list Subject: Re: Support for serial console on legacy free machines In-Reply-To: <200107302240.f6UMeWg2001230@webber.adilger.int> <31754.996543218@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> <20010730215002.I1275@valinux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing We are moving slightly off of my original question which still stands. For machines that do have serial ports but not at legacy addresses (COM1, COM2,....), is it acceptable to use the description of these ports as provided by SPCR and DBGP tables even though Microsoft claims copyright on these tables and retains the option to modify these tables at any time? Would it be preferable to use a table defined as part of a standard like ACPI 2.0 or DIG64 (such a table does not exist at this time but with enough votes for it, it may be added)? -- Khalid ==================================================================== Khalid Aziz Linux Systems Operation R&D (970)898-9214 Hewlett-Packard khalid@fc.hp.com Fort Collins, CO - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/