Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 16:12:41 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.Helsinki.FI>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
       "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] release_resource() check for NULL resource
In-Reply-To: <20051003130048.GE16717@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0510031610050.25136@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
References: <20051002170318.GA22074@home.fluff.org> <20051002103922.34dd287d.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
 <20051003094803.GC3500@home.fluff.org> <9a8748490510030259o43646cbbo22b37f1791d267e@mail.gmail.com>
 <20051003100431.GA16717@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <84144f020510030543q10ff4fd2g138de4d06eddc440@mail.gmail.com>
 <20051003124950.GD16717@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0510031552450.24263@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
 <20051003130048.GE16717@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 784
Lines: 18

On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Russell King wrote:
> However, I think you missed my point though.  release_resource() is
> _not_ the counterpart of request_region().  It's the counter-part of
> request_resource() which does not allocate any memory itself.

So what is the counter-part for request_region if it's not 
release_resource? As far as I can tell, release_region is marked as 
compatability cruft.

But anyway, my point is that dealing with NULL in many release functions 
is beneficial for releasing a partially initialized state.

			Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/