Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 15:01:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 15:01:23 -0400 Received: from borg.org ([208.218.135.231]:24584 "HELO borg.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 15:01:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 15:01:19 -0400 From: Kent Borg To: Riley Williams Cc: Matti Aarnio , =?iso-8859-1?Q?christophe_barb=E9?= , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Virii on vger.kernel.org lists Message-ID: <20010731150119.F10857@borg.org> In-Reply-To: <20010731152714.R2650@mea-ext.zmailer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from rhw@MemAlpha.CX on Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 07:02:18PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing I always thought it was bad form to send any sort of enclosure/attachment to a mailing list. I guess in this MIME-era too many mail clients too easily send the message itself as an attachment. How much does this list need real attachments? Might the list server strip out all attachments?--and if a message has only attachments, maybe try to find the one that is the body, break out it, and re-send it as a boring 822 body with none of the doo-dads likely to catch the attention of Outlook and other clever mail clients. If Outlook is too clever by half, sending only non-clever ASCII content is tempting. -kb, the Kent who has been lurking with mutt. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/