Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932546AbVJEFtJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 01:49:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932548AbVJEFtJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 01:49:09 -0400 Received: from 10.ctyme.com ([69.50.231.10]:16336 "EHLO newton.ctyme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932546AbVJEFtI (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 01:49:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4343694F.5000709@perkel.com> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 22:49:03 -0700 From: Marc Perkel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "D. Hazelton" CC: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: what's next for the linux kernel? References: <20051002204703.GG6290@lkcl.net> <4342DC4D.8090908@perkel.com> <200510050122.39307.dhazelton@enter.net> In-Reply-To: <200510050122.39307.dhazelton@enter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamfilter-host: newton.ctyme.com - http://www.junkemailfilter.com" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1481 Lines: 40 D. Hazelton wrote: > > >>Novell Netware type permissions. ACLs are a step in the right >>direction but Linux isn't any where near where Novell was back in >>1990. Linux lets you - for example - to delete files that you have >>no read or write access rights to. >> >> > >As someone else pointed out, this is because unlinking is related to >your access permissions on the parent directory and not the file. > > > Right - that's Unix "inside the box" thinking. The idea is to make the operating system smarter so that the user doesn't have to deal with what's computer friendly - but reather what makes sense to the user. From a user's perspective if you have not rights to access a file then why should you be allowed to delete it? Now - the idea is to create choice. If you need to emulate Unix nehavior for compatibility that's fine. But I would migrate away from that into a permissions paradygme that worked like Netware. I started with Netware and I'm spoiled. They had it right 15 years ago and Linux isn't any where near what I was with Netware and DOS in 1990. Once you've had this kind of permission power Linux is a real big step down. So - the thread is about the future so I say - time to fix Unix. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/