Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030241AbVJEQoL (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:44:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030245AbVJEQoL (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:44:11 -0400 Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.23]:26527 "EHLO mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030241AbVJEQoJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:44:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:44:07 -0400 (EDT) From: James Morris X-X-Sender: jmorris@excalibur.intercode To: David Howells cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley Subject: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management In-Reply-To: <29942.1128529714@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <29942.1128529714@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 484 Lines: 16 On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, David Howells wrote: > Key management access control through LSM is enabled by CONFIG_SECURITY_KEYS. Any reason why this is configurable? Why wouldn't someone want this? - James -- James Morris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/