Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030370AbVJEUZp (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 16:25:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030372AbVJEUZo (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 16:25:44 -0400 Received: from odyssey.analogic.com ([204.178.40.5]:25605 "EHLO odyssey.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030370AbVJEUZn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 16:25:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 In-Reply-To: <20051005194002.GV7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <4TiWy-4HQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <4U0XH-3Gp-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <87k6gsjalu.fsf@amaterasu.srvr.nix> <4343E611.1000901@perkel.com> <20051005144441.GC8011@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <4343E7AC.6000607@perkel.com> <20051005145606.GA7949@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <4343EC6A.70603@perkel.com> <874q7vhj0c.fsf@amaterasu.srvr.nix> <20051005194002.GV7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Oct 2005 20:25:15.0715 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5572130:01C5C9EA] Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: what's next for the linux kernel? Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 16:25:15 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: what's next for the linux kernel? Thread-Index: AcXJ6uVekJ+p9MtIQ1Kt34eCLfzvAA== From: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" To: "Al Viro" Cc: "Nix" , "Marc Perkel" , "Lennart Sorensen" , <7eggert@gmx.de>, "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" , Reply-To: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2026 Lines: 42 On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 08:16:19PM +0100, Nix wrote: >> On Wed, 05 Oct 2005, Marc Perkel yowled: >>> If you want to start thinking about DOING IT RIGHT you need to think >>> beyond the Unix model and start looking at Netware. Maybe in 5 years >>> Linux will evolve to where Netware was in 1990. > > Ugly as hell and thankfully about to go extinct outside of dark places > where its malignant presense still lingers amidst the Shoggoth droppings? > >> I think Plan 9 is a better goal than Netware. At least it was designed >> by people aiming for a better Unix rather than people trying to build a >> better DOS, and so is more likely to have a compatible philosophy. > > s/aiming.*/with taste that doesn't belong in R'Lyeh/ > Excuse me but wasn't Netware the DOS server that started as a corrupted BSD Unix system, purposely obfuscated to prevent prying eyes from discovering that it was an unauthorized Unix variant? Or was it really a variant of the defunct Xerox XNS that claimed that they created SPX/IPX? Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.6.13 on an i686 machine (5589.55 BogoMips). Warning : 98.36% of all statistics are fiction. **************************************************************** The information transmitted in this message is confidential and may be privileged. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Analogic Corporation immediately - by replying to this message or by sending an email to DeliveryErrors@analogic.com - and destroy all copies of this information, including any attachments, without reading or disclosing them. Thank you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/