Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030433AbVJFAO6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 20:14:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030455AbVJFAO6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 20:14:58 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:58811 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030433AbVJFAO6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 20:14:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20051005.171455.01155506.davem@davemloft.net> To: lkcl@lkcl.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: what's next for the linux kernel? From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20051006000340.GC10538@lkcl.net> References: <20051006000340.GC10538@lkcl.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 876 Lines: 24 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 01:03:40 +0100 > okay, people: any chance of calming / ending / moving this rather > distracting thread? > > davem - any chance of that LVML? > > anyone know where dave works who is willing to kick him before > everyone goes nuts? I still don't see any good reason to make a new mailing list. People argue here because they get a large audience. If we create a new mailing list, the vast majority of folks won't take these threads there because they'll get less of the attention they're after. Why don't we just kill off this silly thread instead? :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/