Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750736AbVJFIWO (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 04:22:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750737AbVJFIWO (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 04:22:14 -0400 Received: from anf141.internetdsl.tpnet.pl ([83.17.87.141]:60559 "EHLO anf141.internetdsl.tpnet.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750736AbVJFIWN (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2005 04:22:13 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [swsusp] separate snapshot functionality to separate file Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:23:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Andrew Morton , kernel list , Nigel Cunningham References: <20051002231332.GA2769@elf.ucw.cz> <200510051020.15400.rjw@sisk.pl> <20051005083341.GA22034@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20051005083341.GA22034@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510061023.16016.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 808 Lines: 24 Hi, On Wednesday, 5 of October 2005 10:33, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > OK, but if we decide to move some functions from one file to another, > > we'll have to wait for another "settle down" period, I think. > > Yes... Then I'd propose that we wait for the next "settle down" period with the split and apply all of the bugfixes and cleanups now. I don't think we'll gain anything by splitting the files immediately and there are some cleanups not in-line with the split (eg. the Nigel's patch eliminating the references to PG_reserved). Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/