Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751322AbVJFTWb@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751322AbVJFTWb (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:22:31 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751323AbVJFTWa
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:22:30 -0400
Received: from free.hands.com ([83.142.228.128]:42963 "EHLO free.hands.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751322AbVJFTWa (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:22:30 -0400
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 20:22:20 +0100
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
Message-ID: <20051006192220.GU10538@lkcl.net>
References: <20051002204703.GG6290@lkcl.net> <54300000.1128297891@[10.10.2.4]> <20051003011041.GN6290@lkcl.net> <200510022028.07930.chase.venters@clientec.com> <20051004125955.GQ10538@lkcl.net> <17218.39427.421249.448094@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20051004161702.GU10538@lkcl.net> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0510041329140.23708@cuia.boston.redhat.com> <20051006000744.GD10538@lkcl.net> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0510061322050.4686@cuia.boston.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0510061322050.4686@cuia.boston.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-hands-com-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lkcl@lkcl.net
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1474
Lines: 46

On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 01:23:18PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> 
> > rik, alan, i replied privately seeking your input on a post i was
> > developing in reply to your earlier comments 
> 
> > "PLEASE REVIEW" as part of the subject.
> 
> I've got better things to do than saving you from yourself.
> 
> I replied to your original email in an attempt to educate
> some of the other readers on the linux-kernel mailing list.
> Private email does not have this same benefit, so there
> was no reason for me to reply.
 
 oh, right.  okay.

 i am disappointed by your response.
 
 i will therefore, instead of soliciting your input _before_
 sending to the LKLM, such that the quality of information sent
 to the list is much higher, now need to go ahead without the
 benefit of your advice, such that your input will be required
 as a "fait accomplit" in order to educate other LKML readers,
 with the unfortunate side-effect of an increased amount
 of noise.

 should you change your mind on this matter i would be honoured
 to receive review comments prior to responding, which will
 be in the next few days.

 l.





-- 
--
<a href="http://lkcl.net">http://lkcl.net</a>
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/