Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932110AbVJGEmq (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 00:42:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932113AbVJGEmq (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 00:42:46 -0400 Received: from koto.vergenet.net ([210.128.90.7]:39591 "EHLO koto.vergenet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932110AbVJGEmp (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 00:42:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 13:39:27 +0900 From: Horms To: Roman Zippel Cc: Colin Leroy , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfs, hfsplus: don't leak s_fs_info and fix an oops Message-ID: <20051007043924.GA20827@verge.net.au> Mail-Followup-To: Roman Zippel , Colin Leroy , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Cluestick: seven User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 840 Lines: 20 I have been looking over CAN-2005-3109, better known as the hfs, hfsplus leak and oops, and I am wondering if the problem is present in 2.4 I took a look at making a backport, and it seems that some of the problems are there, but without a deeper inspection of the code its difficult to tell if the problems manifest or not. For reference, here is the 2.6 variant of the change: http://www.kernel.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=945b092011c6af71a0107be96e119c8c08776f3f I can futher my backport effort and post it for inspection if need be. -- Horms - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/