Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030301AbVJGPFf (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:05:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030307AbVJGPFf (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:05:35 -0400 Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:919 "EHLO mail3.uklinux.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030301AbVJGPFe (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:05:34 -0400 Subject: 2.6.14-rc3-rt10 crashes on boot From: John Rigg To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar Message-Id: Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 16:11:19 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1014 Lines: 22 On Friday 7 October 2005 Ingo Molnar wrote: >i got overflows in initramfs's gunzip with certain debug options. I have >improved the stack footprint of the worst offenders in -rt11 (see the >standalone patch below) - John, does it boot any better? Ah. I'm using initrd. With CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE=y my initrd.img is large, > 3.6MB. Maybe it's time to try initramfs. BTW I'm having trouble enabling DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW. I can see it in arch/i386/Kconfig.debug (and not in arch/x86_64/Kconfig.debug), but it doesn't appear in menuconfig no matter what other kernel hacking options I enable. If I add it manually to .config it just gets removed by `make oldconfig'. Is this an x86_64 issue? For now I'll assume that there is a stack overflow and try initramfs. John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/