From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <12790.1128728334@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> 
References: <12790.1128728334@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>  <20051007233547.GH5856@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20051007220426.GC5856@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <19008.1128699684@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <11615.1128694058@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <26883.1128700665@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <12605.1128728040@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> 
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, keyrings@linux-nfs.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2] 
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 00:45:02 +0100
Message-ID: <12936.1128728702@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 867
Lines: 23


Hi Chris,

David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:

> > I thought that too at first, which is why I flagged it at first.  But I
> > think it's actually not a real problem, because isn't that !CONFIG_KEYS?
> > So, I think it's just cosmetic.
> 
> It is a problem; at least I found it to be one. And no it isn't !CONFIG_KEYS.

It's not one I'd fixed earlier. I fixed the same problem, but in the dummy
routines. It's contingent on CONFIG_KEYS and !CONFIG_SECURITY. Would you be
willing to whip up a patch to change it? I'd do it, but I'm currently logged
in on my laptop over a 9600 baud modem connection.

Thanks!
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/