Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932091AbVJHO0Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:26:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932112AbVJHO0Q (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:26:16 -0400 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.207]:6032 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932091AbVJHO0Q convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:26:16 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=b3CKzQpdiUPNjrIpQ2d+Eko4emgCG+lfwJxF4ePvITx+CPEKjkbipPdoAc7j8Y2uVrRFyUvNq0DQyrxpqaXvZrPBaU/bB46JhmfgQnCC285jPdSpGmNZEhOqAp22HTlTD+trBFU4ZMEwsCHPzTdWotz5ur8fTVP3kfDGTbdnulE= Message-ID: <62b0912f0510080726ge2436e9ra6d7e8d17d1001ee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 14:26:14 +0000 From: Molle Bestefich To: andrew@walrond.org Subject: Re: Anybody know about nforce4 SATA II hot swapping + linux raid? Cc: htejun@gmail.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <43477836.6020107@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <200510071111.46788.andrew@walrond.org> <43477836.6020107@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1400 Lines: 34 Andrew Walrond wrote: > I need to deploy some very resilient servers with hot swapable drives. [snip] > Before I place an order, I need to know whether sata II hot swapping is up to > scratch in the linux kernel, and whether it works nicely with linux software > raid (which I already use/am familiar with). > > Any knowledge greatfully accepted :) IDE hotswap has never worked (OOTB at least) in Linux, and based on my experience it never will. Seems the IDE folks doesn't care a bit about it. (No offence meant. Just keeping it real.) So if you really need this, here's the opportunity to make a whole lot of people happy by implementing it yourself. You'll probably need a lot of time on your hands - there's a very real chance that the IDE maintainers are too busy or whatever to answer any newbie questions you might have about how to attack the IDE layer. Tejun Heo wrote: > If you're looking for stability/resilience for production machine, > IMHO libata isn't still quite ready. I disagree... I've used it for TBs of data without any problems. OTOH, with the regular ATA stuff I've experienced loads of IRQ problems, crashes and hangups. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/