Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932239AbVJIIJu (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:09:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932240AbVJIIJu (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:09:50 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:9894 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932239AbVJIIJu (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:09:50 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 01:09:37 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Coywolf Qi Hunt Cc: webmaster@kernel.org, security@kernel.org, lkml Subject: Re: [Security] "stable" vs "security stable" Message-ID: <20051009080937.GS5856@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <2cd57c900510082307q1841ce8dob1dce3b24edf4ad0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd57c900510082307q1841ce8dob1dce3b24edf4ad0@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 888 Lines: 19 * Coywolf Qi Hunt (coywolf@gmail.com) wrote: > I find the kernel.org first page inconvenient for some people somehow > since the security stable came. It's stable, not security stable. It does contain security fixes sometimes, but it is generally about patches that improve kernel stability. > Now on the kernel.org page, we have 2.6.13.3 and 2.6.14-rc3. If one > wants to get 2.6.14-rc3, he shouldn't get 2.6.14-rc3 Full, but > 2.6.14-rc3 Patch and 2.6.13 Full, which isn't there unfortunately. I > suggest we name 2.6.13.3 "security stable", and 2.6.13 "stable". Perhaps a column B for base. Or just link to ketchup and be done with it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/