Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932240AbVJIIU7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:20:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932241AbVJIIU7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:20:59 -0400 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.194]:12558 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932240AbVJIIU6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:20:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AbWxdg1geCPZCphrINt9B+Y6mCK5j7++Q/vzeXXXCuUxpdrrTJq1/ZrN14bIjzYpCFgKFt+zM61K207pA72jQaLIsq/sev7UNSTR90LXydFXUTlRassHRahMHdVtA0JEgwScxeNGejYiQzHArljws068J2SHRRBmTpd4i19ZHlM= Message-ID: <2cd57c900510090120i27de6d0g110a3ee104f7e4a3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:20:57 +0800 From: Coywolf Qi Hunt To: Chris Wright Subject: Re: [Security] "stable" vs "security stable" Cc: webmaster@kernel.org, security@kernel.org, lkml In-Reply-To: <20051009080937.GS5856@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <2cd57c900510082307q1841ce8dob1dce3b24edf4ad0@mail.gmail.com> <20051009080937.GS5856@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1104 Lines: 29 On 10/9/05, Chris Wright wrote: > * Coywolf Qi Hunt (coywolf@gmail.com) wrote: > > I find the kernel.org first page inconvenient for some people somehow > > since the security stable came. > > It's stable, not security stable. It does contain security fixes > sometimes, but it is generally about patches that improve kernel > stability. OK, "stable" vs "base" now. 2.6.13.3 is the latest stable, and 2.6.13 is the latest base. > > > Now on the kernel.org page, we have 2.6.13.3 and 2.6.14-rc3. If one > > wants to get 2.6.14-rc3, he shouldn't get 2.6.14-rc3 Full, but > > 2.6.14-rc3 Patch and 2.6.13 Full, which isn't there unfortunately. I > > suggest we name 2.6.13.3 "security stable", and 2.6.13 "stable". > > Perhaps a column B for base. Or just link to ketchup and be done with it. > -- Coywolf Qi Hunt http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/