Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932249AbVJIIiK (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:38:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932248AbVJIIiK (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:38:10 -0400 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.205]:17963 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932249AbVJIIiJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:38:09 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HGvmjgjzg3sLMGV+LP1hnj0hzIwqVZSuYj/+Ja9+z11uGAElCl4SHNIw3A9IBKa0xHma9R+J/IkiRHdrLN6DY3yBiXzReVM+q773z3EBj1lllPp142/oF5Yqt39xZ9i3p73toW9wzDC9C854WwFD01CTz+Xyry1i2EzF/uQt/fc= Message-ID: <2cd57c900510090138h664e6c7eyad534f556b464c46@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:38:07 +0800 From: Coywolf Qi Hunt To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" Subject: Re: "stable" vs "security stable" Cc: webmaster@kernel.org, lkml , Linus Torvalds , security@kernel.org, stable@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200510090826.j998QG4H012803@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <2cd57c900510082307q1841ce8dob1dce3b24edf4ad0@mail.gmail.com> <200510090714.j997Ek2i032551@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <2cd57c900510090044o249258cbycf8afab644902e7@mail.gmail.com> <200510090826.j998QG4H012803@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1228 Lines: 35 On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:44:38 +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt said: > > On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > > It is "security stable". Let's take this new notation from now on. > > "Security Stable" doesn't have to be all security related. > > Tell you what - you convince the -stable team, and I'll go along with it.. > Better be "stable" and "base". 2.6.13.3 is the latest stable, 2.6.13 is the latest base. > > (you want stable@kernel.org to replace security@kernel.org too?) > > You're the one who called it "security stable" ;) My fault. I didn't realise stable@kernel.org exist, and CCed the wrong list security@kernel.org. > > > What you did is so stupid to me to to use -R every time. -R implies > > something wrong, and need to revert. > > Umm... my diff had *lower case* -r (recursive), not -R (revert)... I mean `patch -R'. -- Coywolf Qi Hunt http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/