Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932316AbVJJAeO (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:34:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932317AbVJJAeN (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:34:13 -0400 Received: from jp.dhs.org ([213.84.189.153]:6332 "EHLO debian.jp.dhs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932316AbVJJAeN (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:34:13 -0400 From: Jan Pieter To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Common symbol support for 2.6 modules Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 02:34:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: pptp@jp.dhs.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510100234.10419.pptp@jp.dhs.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 645 Lines: 16 I'm building a 2.6 kernel module from an object file that is compiled without -fno-common. I have no source from that object file, so I can not recompile it. Does someone have a patch to include common symbol support in 2.6 kernels? Or can someone tell me in which kernel that support has been first taken out? Or have the patch that removed the support for common symbols? Thank you. Jan Pieter. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/