Message-Id: <200510091538.j99FcFmW005439@inti.inf.utfsm.cl>
To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Linux Visionaries Mailing List <lvml@lists.blackwhale.net>
Subject: Re: Why no XML in the Kernel? 
In-Reply-To: Message from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> 
   of "Sat, 08 Oct 2005 02:34:57 +0100." <20051008013457.GR18797@lkcl.net> 
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 12:38:15 -0300
From: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1207
Lines: 25

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> wrote:

[...]

>  it's a friggin sight better than contemplating XML, but it also comes
>  with a price tag: in this case, nearly 70,000 lines of library code
>  that "encapsulates" and "extracts" the data structures for you, at
>  runtime [yes, you can supply your own malloc and free routines]

70 KSLOC is a /lot/, the benefit of having that in kernel would have to be
very large to justify it. And in the frame of an operating system that
believes in flat ("just stream of bytes") interfaces throughout and
hopefully very simple tools on top ("cat", "more", "grep") that are
combined by the user to do complex stuff I just don't see it.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/