Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 07:47:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 07:47:32 -0400 Received: from tangens.hometree.net ([212.34.181.34]:51919 "EHLO mail.hometree.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 07:47:30 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: forge.intermeta.de!not-for-mail From: "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" Newsgroups: hometree.linux.kernel Subject: [Moving rapidly away from LKM] (Was: Re: [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Organization: INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH Lines: 79 Message-ID: <9p9l5d$r8e$1@forge.intermeta.de> In-Reply-To: <3BB82DA9.34499802@idb.hist.no> Reply-To: hps@intermeta.de NNTP-Posting-Host: forge.intermeta.de X-Trace: tangens.hometree.net 1001936877 12882 212.34.181.4 (1 Oct 2001 11:47:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@intermeta.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:47:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Copyright: (C) 1996-2001 Henning Schmiedehausen X-No-Archive: yes X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.1 (NOV) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Helge Hafting writes: >And the one to blame here isn't the virus writer. The ones to blame >are: >1. Whoever decided to install that vulnerable software. "The ones to blame are not the people that build the bombs. The ones to blame are the people that live in normal houses with normal locks or even let their doors open instead of living in fortified bunkers and shoot everyone on sight". Come on. I may not know what's right, but I know this can't be it. The blame is on both sides. On the people that write the stuff and the ones that are not able to install the most basic defenses on their business critical systems. > This one isn't popular because it is someone inside the company. I don't think so. I'd say 6 of 10 systems in larger companies are installed either by the vendor via their own "consulting branch" or by a "vendor certified partner" or by a hired consulting branch. Most of the bigger companies have _enough_ to do with just keeping this stuff running. Or they even hire outside resources to run their stuff. [...Your argumentation goes downhill from here...] Fact is: Most companies don't install IIS just because they're Microsoft slaves. They install it, because another 3rd party application that depends on yet another application that needs another piece of software to run is only available on (you may already have guessed it) WIN32. OLE, Visual Basic and all the heavily glued together windows stuff. That is what drags people to the WIN32. And once you're here, you use IIS. Not Apache. Not iPlanet. Not just the "nice icons to click" that most of the clueless here seem to think. Try to set up an Oracle development shop in an "all Solaris, all Linux" environment. You can't get 99% of the frontends for your platform? Too bad. Others do and they're working faster than you." Try that with Intershop. With Cache. Other Borland stuff. SAP R/3. You get all the backends for Linux. The frontends? Even Java development is easier with WIN32 (though JBuilder and NetBeans run quite usable under Linux). But the native SUN JDK runs faster on Win32 than on their own Sparc platform. Than on Linux. Why? Because Sun throws all of its engineering efforts into WIN32 and not into Sparc? I know all about the "ok, let's use Linux in our back office and WIN32 just on the desktops" mentality. But you might not understand that companies then have to hire not just one but two people. One to admin the desktops, one for the back ends. In times when getting a single clueful individual is hard to do. And budget cuts say "we get _one_ admin. Not two." So you go for an uniform solution to the problem. Use one platform for everything. Linux loses in such shops every time. When companies like IBM, Oracle and SAP spell "commitment to Linux" as "we port _everything not just our servers to Linux", then Linux get a chance here. I don't see this. And what has all of this to do with Linux kernel? Regards Henning -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.de Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/