Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751324AbVJKAuB (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:50:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751325AbVJKAuB (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:50:01 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:33164 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751324AbVJKAuB (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:50:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:49:31 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: OBATA Noboru Cc: hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Dump Summit 2005 Message-Id: <20051010174931.223310de.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20051006.211718.74749573.noboru.obata.ar@hitachi.com> References: <20050921.205550.927509530.hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com> <20051006.211718.74749573.noboru.obata.ar@hitachi.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 673 Lines: 15 OBATA Noboru wrote: > > > We had a Linux Kernel Dump Summit 2005. I was rather expecting that the various groups which are interested in crash dumping would converge around kdump once it was merged. But it seems that this is not the case and that work continues on other strategies. Is that a correct impression? If so, what shortcoming(s) in kdump are causing people to be reluctant to use it? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/