Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751402AbVJKHfj (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 03:35:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751405AbVJKHfj (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 03:35:39 -0400 Received: from tentacle.b.gz.ru ([217.67.124.4]:42957 "EHLO tentacle.sectorb.msk.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751402AbVJKHfi (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 03:35:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:35:32 +0400 From: "Vladimir B. Savkin" To: Jonas Oreland Cc: john stultz , Andi Kleen , lkml , Andrew Morton , discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs Message-ID: <20051011073532.GA29254@tentacle.sectorb.msk.ru> References: <1127157404.3455.209.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <20051007122624.GA23606@tentacle.sectorb.msk.ru> <200510071431.47245.ak@suse.de> <20051008101153.GA1541@tentacle.sectorb.msk.ru> <1128967404.8195.419.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <20051010181216.GA21548@tentacle.sectorb.msk.ru> <434AB0BE.3080206@mysql.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <434AB0BE.3080206@mysql.com> X-Organization: Moscow State Univ., Institute of Mechanics X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.13.3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 681 Lines: 19 On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 08:19:42PM +0200, Jonas Oreland wrote: > Hi, > > check http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5283 Excuse me for possibly dumb question, but is it safe to leave TSCs unsynchronized when using other time source? How will other subsystems e.g. traffic queueing disciplines react? ~ :wq With best regards, Vladimir Savkin. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/