Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932255AbVJKSY3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:24:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932259AbVJKSY3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:24:29 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:47782 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932255AbVJKSY2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:24:28 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Demand faulting for hugetlb From: Adam Litke To: akpm@osdl.org Cc: "ADAM G. LITKE [imap]" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, David Gibson , ak@suse.de, hugh@veritas.com Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:24:17 -0500 Message-Id: <1129055057.22182.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 707 Lines: 15 Ok, here's the next iteration of these patches. I think I've handled the truncate() case by comparing the hugetlbfs inode's i_size with the mapping offset of the requested page to make sure it hasn't been truncated. Can anyone confirm or deny that I have the locking correct for this? The other patches are still unchanged. Andrew: Did Andi Kleen's explanation of huge_pages_needed() satisfy? -- Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com) IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/