Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932357AbVJKUDW (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:03:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932358AbVJKUDW (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:03:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:52396 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932357AbVJKUDW (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:03:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:02:33 -0400 From: Alan Cox To: Alan Stern Cc: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" , vsu@altlinux.ru, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, laforge@gnumonks.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Jackson , security@linux.kernel.org, vendor-sec@lst.de Subject: Re: [Security] Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BUG/PATCH/RFC] Oops while completing async USB via usbdevio Message-ID: <20051011200233.GB25581@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 627 Lines: 13 On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 03:13:39PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > Surely Linux uses entirely original code, with no hangovers from the > original AT&T Unix... Besides, to the best of my recollection, the two > operations are equal in speed on a PDP-11. I've no idea but I don't believe the relative speed of PDP_11 operations is security critical in Linux so can you trim the cc line - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/