Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:30:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:30:12 -0400 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:26601 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:30:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 10:28:24 -0600 Message-Id: <200110011628.f91GSOc28559@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Cc: Rik van Riel , Kenneth Johansson , "Randy.Dunlap" , Andreas Dilger , , , Subject: Re: [patch] netconsole-2.4.10-B1 In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <200109301225.f8UCPXl16936@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar writes: [Much rationalising deleted:-] > but telling any side to be wrong is stupid - both are correct, and > the correct meaning of 'server' depends alot on context. this is why > i defined the terms. Hey! I didn't call anyone stupid. I didn't even call the idea stupid. I think your terminology is backwards to the way I think and what seems to be accepted practice (and I notice I'm not alone in that). However, "he who writes the code gets to choose", and I'd be a hypocrite to say otherwise :-) I was just hoping to change your mind. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/