Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:30:29 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Marcin Owsiany <marcin@owsiany.pl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SCSI "asking for cache data failed"
Message-ID: <20051013123028.GE6603@suse.de>
References: <20051013104536.GA10525@kufelek> <1129208154.18635.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1129208154.18635.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1064
Lines: 27

On Thu, Oct 13 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Iau, 2005-10-13 at 12:45 +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > I'm wondering about the following messages, which appeared when I upgraded from
> > 2.4 to 2.6:
> > 
> > | sda: asking for cache data failed
> > | sda: assuming drive cache: write through
> > 
> > (a larger log snippet below)
> 
> The kernel asks the SCSI drive for its cache parameters. The AMI raid
> card sitting in the middle doesn't know how to handle this so this
> message occurs. It should be ok providing the raid card itself is
> handling the consistency correctly but check with your card vendor.

The assumption that sd makes might be a little on the risky side though,
would seem a lot safer to assume write back if you don't know the
policy. At least that wont bring surprises later on...

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/