Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:30:38 +0200
From: Marcin Owsiany <marcin@owsiany.pl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SCSI "asking for cache data failed"
Message-ID: <20051013183038.GA13293@kufelek>
References: <20051013104536.GA10525@kufelek> <1129208154.18635.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1129208154.18635.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1228
Lines: 32

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Iau, 2005-10-13 at 12:45 +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > I'm wondering about the following messages, which appeared when I upgraded from
> > 2.4 to 2.6:
> > 
> > | sda: asking for cache data failed
> > | sda: assuming drive cache: write through
> > 
> > (a larger log snippet below)
> 
[...]
> It should be ok providing the raid card itself is
> handling the consistency correctly but check with your card vendor.

Does that depend on the card only, or rather on the driver?
(megaraid_mbox in this case) If the latter, then maybe someone familiar
with its code can tell if the driver is OK in this regard?

thanks,

Marcin
-- 
Marcin Owsiany <marcin@owsiany.pl>              http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216  FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75  D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216
 
"Every program in development at MIT expands until it can read mail."
                                                              -- Unknown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/