Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932469AbVJMUNk (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:13:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932491AbVJMUNk (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:13:40 -0400 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:3524 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932469AbVJMUNk (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:13:40 -0400 Subject: Re: sched_clock -> check_tsc_unstable -> tsc_read_c3_time ?!? From: Lee Revell To: john stultz Cc: linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <1129234306.27168.7.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> References: <1129233687.16243.52.camel@mindpipe> <1129234306.27168.7.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:13:26 -0400 Message-Id: <1129234407.16243.58.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 503 Lines: 13 On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 13:11 -0700, john stultz wrote: > Yea, you're right about the inlining. Although I'm not sure why those > functions should take microseconds to execute. That's very strange. Latency tracing overhead plus a slow (600MHz) machine? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/