Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932494AbVJMUSO (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:18:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932491AbVJMUSO (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:18:14 -0400 Received: from seqima.han-solo.net ([83.138.65.243]:56292 "EHLO seqima.han-solo.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932494AbVJMUSN (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:18:13 -0400 Message-ID: <434EC0FD.6000706@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:18:05 +0200 From: Georg Lippold User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050805) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE References: <431628D5.1040709@zytor.com> <434C1189.4090207@gmail.com> <200510112221.05789.ak@suse.de> <434C1AB6.5000104@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <434C1AB6.5000104@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 732 Lines: 24 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > OK... So I think 1024 bytes should be used... Does it sound OK? So, it boils down to using my previously posted patch? > But I still think that the documentation should not specify a fixed > size, so that boot loaders will pass the full command line to the kernel. In my patch, it states: "a boot loader may allow a longer command line to be passed to permit future kernels to extend this limit." (as always in Documentation/i386/boot.txt) Greetings, Georg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/