Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751344AbVJPRyF (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:54:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751345AbVJPRyF (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:54:05 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:59849 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751344AbVJPRyE (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:54:04 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:53:46 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: Mel Gorman Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jschopp@austin.ibm.com, kravetz@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17 Message-Id: <20051016105346.01c79929.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20051011151221.16178.67130.sendpatchset@skynet.csn.ul.ie> <20051015195213.44e0dabb.pj@sgi.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 579 Lines: 15 Mel wrote: > I would be happy with __GFP_USERRCLM but __GFP_EASYRCLM may be more > obvious? I would be delighted with either one. Yes, __GFP_EASYRCLM is more obvious. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/