Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751347AbVJPSDi (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:03:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751348AbVJPSDi (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:03:38 -0400 Received: from holly.csn.ul.ie ([136.201.105.4]:34697 "EHLO holly.csn.ul.ie") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbVJPSDh (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:03:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:03:27 +0100 (IST) From: Mel Gorman X-X-Sender: mel@skynet To: Paul Jackson Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jschopp@austin.ibm.com, kravetz@us.ibm.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Memory Management List , lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17 In-Reply-To: <20051016105346.01c79929.pj@sgi.com> Message-ID: References: <20051011151221.16178.67130.sendpatchset@skynet.csn.ul.ie> <20051015195213.44e0dabb.pj@sgi.com> <20051016105346.01c79929.pj@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 805 Lines: 24 On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Paul Jackson wrote: > Mel wrote: > > I would be happy with __GFP_USERRCLM but __GFP_EASYRCLM may be more > > obvious? > > I would be delighted with either one. Yes, __GFP_EASYRCLM is more obvious. > __GFP_EASYRCLM it is then unless someone has an objection. For consistency, RCLM_USER will change to RCLM_EASY as well. Changing one and not the other makes no sense to me. > -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Java Applications Developer University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/