Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932236AbVJQJxr (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:53:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932240AbVJQJxr (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:53:47 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:906 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932236AbVJQJxq (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:53:46 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:53:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Ravikiran G Thirumalai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org, tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@osdl.org, shai@scalex86.org References: <20051017093654.GA7652@localhost.localdomain> <20051017025007.35ae8d0e.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20051017025007.35ae8d0e.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510171153.56063.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 730 Lines: 22 On Monday 17 October 2005 11:50, Andrew Morton wrote: > > This is an ia64 patch - what point was there in testing it on an x460? > > Is something missing here? x86-64 shares that code with ia64. The patch is actually not quite correct - in theory node 0 could be too small to contain the full swiotlb bounce buffers. The real fix would be to get rid of the pgdata lists and just walk the node_online_map on bootmem.c. The memory hotplug guys have a patch pending for this. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/