Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932265AbVJQLAd (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:00:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932266AbVJQLAd (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:00:33 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:13012 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932265AbVJQLAc (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:00:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:00:06 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrew Morton Cc: zippel@linux-m68k.org, tglx@linutronix.de, george@mvista.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, johnstul@us.ibm.com, paulmck@us.ibm.com, hch@infradead.org, oleg@tv-sign.ru, tim.bird@am.sony.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5 Message-ID: <20051017110006.GA10638@elte.hu> References: <1129016558.1728.285.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <434DA06C.7050801@mvista.com> <1129490809.1728.874.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <20051017075917.GA4827@elte.hu> <20051017094153.GA9091@elte.hu> <20051017025657.0d2d09cc.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051017025657.0d2d09cc.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1478 Lines: 34 * Andrew Morton wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > [...] It will waste my time, I could spend on other projects and it > > > will put Andrew in the unfortunate position to decide, which patch to > > > accept. [...] > > > > yes, please, put Andrew (and me too) into that unfortunate position! > > Please, pretty please, get on with the patches! > > I'm with Roman on this one - the old "show me the code" trick which > people use to quash other people's objections is rather poor form - we > should simply address the objections as raised. > > That being said, I'll confess that I've largely ignored this > discussion in the hope that things would get sorted out. Seems that > this won't be happening and as Roman's opinions carry weight I do > intend to solicit a (brief!) summary of his objections from him when > the patch comes round again. Sorry. Fine with me. A brief summary of technical objections (without any personal attacks) is all we wanted to have to begin with. "Show me the code" was my last-ditch attempt to move this seemingly unmovable discussion from a communication channel where the chemistry doesnt seem to work out to a more objective format. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/