Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751192AbVJQRfr (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:35:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751183AbVJQRfr (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:35:47 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:30119 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751181AbVJQRfq (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:35:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:35:35 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Roman Zippel Cc: Thomas Gleixner , George Anzinger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , johnstul@us.ibm.com, paulmck@us.ibm.com, Christoph Hellwig , oleg@tv-sign.ru, tim.bird@am.sony.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5 Message-ID: <20051017173535.GB5719@elte.hu> References: <434DA06C.7050801@mvista.com> <1129490809.1728.874.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <20051017075917.GA4827@elte.hu> <20051017094153.GA9091@elte.hu> <20051017163958.GA4897@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2245 Lines: 49 * Roman Zippel wrote: > > > Just for the record: in this thread I got exactly three answers > > > from Thomas. I don't know where you got the other nine mails from, > > > maybe you could forward them to me, as they seem to contain the > > > "patient explanations" I'm missing. > > > > > here are all the replies from Thomas, regarding ktimers: > > > > 12359 * Sep 22 Thomas Gleixner ( 319) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem > > 12362 * Sep 23 Thomas Gleixner ( 49) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem > > 12363 * Sep 23 Thomas Gleixner ( 235) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem > > 12367 * Sep 24 Thomas Gleixner ( 214) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem > > 12368 * Sep 25 Thomas Gleixner ( 25) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem > > 12369 * Sep 25 Thomas Gleixner ( 17) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem > > 12370 * Sep 25 Thomas Gleixner ( 10) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem > > Different thread and not directly related to issues with the patch. ugh, what were they about then, poetry? Ah i think i know what you mean: these were about a PREVIOUS VERSION of the patch, and hence they fell off the face of the earth, regardless of their content, right? What a tricky little definition of "Thomas replied only 3 times" ... > > 12387 * Oct 01 Thomas Gleixner ( 817) Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc > > 12419 * Oct 11 Thomas Gleixner ( 41) Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc > > 12434 * Oct 16 Thomas Gleixner ( 40) Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc > > That's the only mails related to the patch. your latest mail with the list of 'open' issues seems to contradict your assertion that the above 3 mails from Thomas where "the only mails related to the patch". E.g.: ' - "timer API" vs "timeout API": I got absolutely no acknowlegement that this might be a little confusing and in consequence "process timer" may be a better name. ' was raised and discussed in the first chunk of mails just as well. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/