Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S275825AbRJBGGn>; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 02:06:43 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S275826AbRJBGGe>; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 02:06:34 -0400
Received: from [200.222.192.240] ([200.222.192.240]:23688 "EHLO
	pervalidus.dyndns.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S275825AbRJBGG3>; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 02:06:29 -0400
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 03:06:55 -0300
From: =?unknown-8bit?B?RnLpZOlyaWMgTC4gVy4=?= Meunier <0@pervalidus.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext3 0.9.10 for Alan's tree
Message-ID: <20011002030655.E249@pervalidus>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i
X-Mailer: Mutt/1.3.21i - Linux 2.4.10
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Andrew Morton wrote:

> We prefer to test a lot before releasing, and the one time I
> skipped that step was for 2.4.10, and it was the one which is
> broken. Sigh.

How broken ? I ask because I'm worried since I use it. Or
it's just the compilation problem with CONFIG_BUFFER_DEBUG
and nothing serious ?

PS: I don't see any other reports on ext3-users.

-- 
0@pervalidus.{net, {dyndns.}org} Tel: 55-21-2717-2399 (Niter?i-RJ BR)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/