Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751349AbVJSVMF (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:12:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751351AbVJSVME (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:12:04 -0400 Received: from qproxy.gmail.com ([72.14.204.204]:40714 "EHLO qproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751349AbVJSVMD (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:12:03 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=JZPVhtQT4+o6LJu8r7NfwG6FVXQOHfnZ2ODjPaLEoU6xgqhXjyOnL7MDsEm/Px1wGYRe1tj3Xd3DCt39jAyF7gf6FMINmWiAITXihmsnkQl/ubvTr6uVy6l82In8Gw+dTCzc+aXQTJiTidtj6FKHZq7VdQAvUxAlQ6sHj08gD5s= Subject: Re: Is ext3 flush data to disk when files are closed? From: Badari Pulavarty To: Andrew Morton Cc: uszhaoxin@gmail.com, lkml In-Reply-To: <20051019130010.28693db1.akpm@osdl.org> References: <4ae3c140510190831j7530742aqc2b82e9e9cd6dde3@mail.gmail.com> <1129737026.23632.113.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051019130010.28693db1.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:11:26 -0700 Message-Id: <1129756286.8716.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2157 Lines: 56 On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 13:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 11:31 -0400, Xin Zhao wrote: > > > As far as I know, if an application modifies a file on an ext3 file > > > ssytem, it actually change the page cache, and the dirty pages will be > > > flushed to disk by kupdate periodically. > > > > > > My question is: if a file is to be closed, but some of its data pages > > > are marked as dirty, will system block on close() and wait for dirty > > > pages being flushed to disk? If so, it seems to decrease performance > > > significantly if a lot of updates on many small files are involved. > > > > > > Can someone point me to the right place to check how it works? Thanks! > > > > On the last close() of the file, it should be flushed through .. > > > > iput_final() -> generic_drop_inode() -> write_inode_now() > > -> __writeback_single_inode() -> __sync_single_inode() > > -> do_writepages() > > The dcache's reference to the inode will prevent this from happening at > close() time. > I thought so too, till I wrote a kprobe/systemtap script to print the callers of generic_forget_inode() earlier and saw that most of my stacks are from exit() or close(). 0xffffffff801a0222 : generic_drop_inode+0x2/0x170 [] 0xffffffff8019eeb0 : iput+0x50/0x90 [] 0xffffffff8019c7bb : dput+0x1db/0x220 [] 0xffffffff80184461 : __fput+0x171/0x1e0 [] 0xffffffff801829ce : filp_close+0x6e/0x90 [] 0xffffffff801388eb : put_files_struct+0x6b/0xc0 [] 0xffffffff801392ef : do_exit+0x1ff/0xbb0 [] 0xffffffff801a0222 : generic_drop_inode+0x2/0x170 [] 0xffffffff8019eeb0 : iput+0x50/0x90 [] 0xffffffff8019c7bb : dput+0x1db/0x220 [] 0xffffffff80184461 : __fput+0x171/0x1e0 [] 0xffffffff801829ce : filp_close+0x6e/0x90 [] 0xffffffff80182a90 : sys_close+0xa0/0xd0 [] 0xffffffff8010dbc2 : system_call+0x1a/0x83 [] Thanks, Badari - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/