Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751575AbVJSWJa (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:09:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751580AbVJSWJ3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:09:29 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:26061 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751577AbVJSWJ3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:09:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:09:40 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Badari Pulavarty Cc: uszhaoxin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is ext3 flush data to disk when files are closed? Message-Id: <20051019150940.477e2184.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1129756286.8716.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <4ae3c140510190831j7530742aqc2b82e9e9cd6dde3@mail.gmail.com> <1129737026.23632.113.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051019130010.28693db1.akpm@osdl.org> <1129756286.8716.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2247 Lines: 56 Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 13:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 11:31 -0400, Xin Zhao wrote: > > > > As far as I know, if an application modifies a file on an ext3 file > > > > ssytem, it actually change the page cache, and the dirty pages will be > > > > flushed to disk by kupdate periodically. > > > > > > > > My question is: if a file is to be closed, but some of its data pages > > > > are marked as dirty, will system block on close() and wait for dirty > > > > pages being flushed to disk? If so, it seems to decrease performance > > > > significantly if a lot of updates on many small files are involved. > > > > > > > > Can someone point me to the right place to check how it works? Thanks! > > > > > > On the last close() of the file, it should be flushed through .. > > > > > > iput_final() -> generic_drop_inode() -> write_inode_now() > > > -> __writeback_single_inode() -> __sync_single_inode() > > > -> do_writepages() > > > > The dcache's reference to the inode will prevent this from happening at > > close() time. > > > > I thought so too, till I wrote a kprobe/systemtap script to print > the callers of generic_forget_inode() earlier and saw that most > of my stacks are from exit() or close(). > > 0xffffffff801a0222 : generic_drop_inode+0x2/0x170 [] > 0xffffffff8019eeb0 : iput+0x50/0x90 [] > 0xffffffff8019c7bb : dput+0x1db/0x220 [] > 0xffffffff80184461 : __fput+0x171/0x1e0 [] > 0xffffffff801829ce : filp_close+0x6e/0x90 [] > 0xffffffff801388eb : put_files_struct+0x6b/0xc0 [] > 0xffffffff801392ef : do_exit+0x1ff/0xbb0 [] > But generic_forget_inode usually doesn't dispose of the inode. if (!hlist_unhashed(&inode->i_hash)) { if (!(inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY|I_LOCK))) list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_unused); inodes_stat.nr_unused++; if (!sb || (sb->s_flags & MS_ACTIVE)) { spin_unlock(&inode_lock); return; } - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/