Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965023AbVJUQ1f (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:27:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965025AbVJUQ1e (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:27:34 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:44732 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965023AbVJUQ1e (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:27:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:27:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki cc: Simon Derr , Andrew Morton , Mike Kravetz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Magnus Damm , Marcelo Tosatti , Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface In-Reply-To: <435896CA.1000101@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20051020225935.19761.57434.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20051020225955.19761.53060.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <4358588D.1080307@jp.fujitsu.com> <435896CA.1000101@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 595 Lines: 17 On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > > How about this ? > > > +cpuset_update_task_mems_allowed(task, new); (this isn't implemented > > > now > > *new* is already guaranteed to be the subset of current mem_allowed. > Is this violate the permission ? Could the cpuset_mems_allowed(task) function update the mems_allowed if needed? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/