Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:05:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:04:50 -0400 Received: from web13102.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.174.147]:24332 "HELO web13102.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:04:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20011002180502.25799.qmail@web13102.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 11:05:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Rankin Subject: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel? To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I have 2 servers which might need to go unattended for several weeks at a time. They are currently running vanilla 2.4.10 but my confidence in this (SMP) kernel has been shaken when it spontaneously froze solid the other day while I was viewing a web-page in Mozilla. (And all I was doing was using the scrollbar on an already-loaded page! No oops messages, no chance to use Alt-SysRq, nothing.) All that the servers would be doing would be connecting to the Internet periodically using PPPoE and DSL (with NAT), forwarding emails and performing various CPU-bound tasks. They should both have ample available memory and should not need to swap much, if at all. Does anyone have any kernel recommendations / counter-recommendations, please? One server is SMP, the other is UP, and both are Intel architecture. Cheers, Chris __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/