Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:19:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:19:40 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:37129 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:19:24 -0400 Subject: Re: Huge console switching lags To: jfbeam@bluetopia.net (Ricky Beam) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 19:24:07 +0100 (BST) Cc: akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton), lenstra@tiscalinet.it (Lorenzo Allegrucci), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Ricky Beam" at Oct 02, 2001 02:10:41 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > And what's the brilliant reason for this? And don't give any BS about it > taking too long inside an interrupt context -- we're switching consoles not > start netscrape. A console switch has to wait until queued I/O to that console is complete, which in turn could take a measurable amount of time - so it has to block. Also a console switch on a frame buffer with no hardware banking can take a lot of time. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/