Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:23:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:23:08 -0400 Received: from femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.0.95.84]:63705 "EHLO femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:22:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 13:22:46 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel? Message-ID: <20011002132246.A32669@cy599856-a.home.com> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011002180502.25799.qmail@web13102.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011002180502.25799.qmail@web13102.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i X-Editor: GNU Emacs 20.7.2 X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 2.4.10-ac3 i586 K6-3+ X-Uptime: 13:18:08 up 11:38, 2 users, load average: 0.42, 0.40, 0.43 From: Josh McKinney Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On approximately Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:05:02AM -0700, Chris Rankin wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone have any kernel recommendations / > counter-recommendations, please? One server is SMP, > the other is UP, and both are Intel architecture. > > Cheers, > Chris > The latest ac kernels are stable as hell for me. I would run them on any production machine. -- Linux, the choice | What makes you think graduate school is of a GNU generation -o) | supposed to be satisfying? -- Erica Jong, Kernel 2.4.10-ac3 /\ | "Fear of Flying" on a i586 _\_v | | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/