Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932095AbVJYIuG (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 04:50:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932096AbVJYIuF (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 04:50:05 -0400 Received: from ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.139]:30664 "EHLO ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932095AbVJYIuE (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 04:50:04 -0400 X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add notification of page becoming writable to VMA ops From: Anton Altaparmakov To: Hugh Dickins Cc: David Howells , Andrew Morton , torvalds@osdl.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1130168619.19518.43.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <1130167005.19518.35.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <7872.1130167591@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <9792.1130171024@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <1130227159.8169.5.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Computing Service, University of Cambridge, UK Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:49:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1130230190.8169.21.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2056 Lines: 53 On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 09:26 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 20:11 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > > There really is quite a difference between mm/*.c in -mm and Linus > > kernel at present. Is all this planned to be merged as soon as 2.6.14 > > is out or is -mm just a playground for now with no mainline merge > > intentions? > > It certainly won't all be merged as soon as 2.6.14 is out, some of it > has only just got into -mm. Andrew's current intention is to merge > the early part of the changes soonish after 2.6.14 gets out, but he's > not likely to merge it all into 2.6.15. Ok, sounds good. As long as they at least start converging... > But we aren't using -mm as a playground: it is likely to go forward, > provided it doesn't show regressions of some kind while it's in -mm. Cool. > > Just asking so I know whether to work against stock kernels or -mm for > > the moment... > > I'd recommend -mm for now. Great, thanks, will do. > page_mkwrite will want a spell in there too, won't it? Sure. But if the other mm changes in -mm were not going forward it would be a little silly to get page_mkwrite to work there only to have to rewrite it in order to get it merged... If Linus really is going to release .14 in the next few days, page_mkwrite is never going to make it into .15 anyway, no matter what... But .16 would be a realistic target I would have thought which seems to fit in nicely with the plans for -mm. (-: Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/