Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:37:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:37:43 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:54281 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:37:18 -0400 Subject: Re: partition table read incorrectly To: wichert@cistron.nl (Wichert Akkerman) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 19:42:13 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-lvm@sistina.com In-Reply-To: <20011002202934.G14582@wiggy.net> from "Wichert Akkerman" at Oct 02, 2001 08:29:34 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I seem to run into a weird problem. LVM refused to work properly, > after a "vgscan" command "vgchange -a y" would still complain > that things weren't consistent and I got a messages about an > I/O error on 08:11. Does it complain about wrong block sizes ? > Interestingly my sdb does not have any partitions since it's one > big PV, and fdisk agrees with me on that. However the kernel > seems to thing I do have a partition there and as a result LVM > seems to get somewhat confused. The partition code will look for tables. That bit is fine The exact error would be good too - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/