Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S276449AbRJBSgU>; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:36:20 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S276318AbRJBSgL>; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:36:11 -0400
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:52233 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S276406AbRJBSfy>; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:35:54 -0400
Subject: Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?
To: rankincj@yahoo.com (Chris Rankin)
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 19:41:24 +0100 (BST)
Cc: mason@suse.com (Chris Mason), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20011002182715.25244.qmail@web13104.mail.yahoo.com> from "Chris Rankin" at Oct 02, 2001 11:27:15 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E15oUTs-0005Xh-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> instance, I subsequently read a posting from Alan Cox
> saying that 2.4.10 didn't survive overnight for him,
> implying that he occasionally roasts penguins in some
> kind of server-dungeon...

I run brutal load test sets on the boxes. Not all -ac kernels survive them
either .  Thats more useful as "it contains bugs" not "it will break under
normal load".

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/