Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:45:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:45:43 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:59887 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:45:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:45:54 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel? Message-ID: <20011002124554.B1012@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011002182715.25244.qmail@web13104.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:41:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > instance, I subsequently read a posting from Alan Cox > > saying that 2.4.10 didn't survive overnight for him, > > implying that he occasionally roasts penguins in some > > kind of server-dungeon... > > I run brutal load test sets on the boxes. Not all -ac kernels survive them > either . Thats more useful as "it contains bugs" not "it will break under > normal load". > Can you describe, or point to a description of your tests? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/