Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S276652AbRJBTpx>; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:45:53 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S276649AbRJBTpn>; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:45:43 -0400
Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:59887
	"EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S276652AbRJBTpc>; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:45:32 -0400
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:45:54 -0700
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?
Message-ID: <20011002124554.B1012@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>
Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20011002182715.25244.qmail@web13104.mail.yahoo.com> <E15oUTs-0005Xh-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E15oUTs-0005Xh-00@the-village.bc.nu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:41:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > instance, I subsequently read a posting from Alan Cox
> > saying that 2.4.10 didn't survive overnight for him,
> > implying that he occasionally roasts penguins in some
> > kind of server-dungeon...
> 
> I run brutal load test sets on the boxes. Not all -ac kernels survive them
> either .  Thats more useful as "it contains bugs" not "it will break under
> normal load".
> 

Can you describe, or point to a description of your tests?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/