Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932583AbVJZIFE (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 04:05:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932586AbVJZIFE (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 04:05:04 -0400 Received: from rs1.theo-phys.uni-essen.de ([132.252.73.3]:37007 "EHLO rs1.Theo-Phys.Uni-Essen.DE") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932583AbVJZIFC (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 04:05:02 -0400 Message-Id: <200510260804.KAA16550@next12.theo-phys.uni-essen.de> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 4.2mach_patches v148.2) In-Reply-To: <20051026034235.GB6423@verge.net.au> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 4.2mach_patches [i386] (Enhance 2.2p3, May 2000) From: Ruediger Oberhage Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:04:45 +0200 To: Horms Subject: Re: Bug#325117: NFS client problem with kernel 2.6 and SGI IRIX 6.5 cc: Trond Myklebust , 325117@bugs.debian.org, ruediger@theo-phys.uni-essen.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: ruediger@theo-phys.uni-essen.de References: <200510140905.LAA10947@next12.theo-phys.uni-essen.de> <1129314142.8443.13.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <200510191652.SAA13594@next12.theo-phys.uni-essen.de> <1129756421.8971.19.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20051026034235.GB6423@verge.net.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1563 Lines: 37 Hello! > http://client.linux-nfs.org/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.12/linux-2.6.12-43-dirent_fix.dif > > > > This should normally suffice to fix the SGI problem. > > Thanks, I'll confine subseqent discussion to 325117@bugs.debian.org > as debian packaging issues don't need to be on lkml. That's fine with me - for the moment at least. I'm busy applying the patch to the "2.6.12-Debian-sarge"-kernel package. The patch doesn't apply automatically, but I think I succeeded in doing so manually. Now my problem is, that the kernel doesn't compile - but not because of the patch or in the nfs-region, but with a (unused by me) scsi-driver at the moment. I'll try to sort things out, have a proper 'patched' kernel and shall report afterwards. I also think, that a 'tcpdump' of the nfs-traffic makes only sense after(!) applying the patch from a patched kernel; so I'll postpone its submission till after I succeed (hopefully). Be warned, though, that the KNOPPIX-kernel still has the 'resources'- problem, although not the 'find' one. Thus if this kernel has the 'dirent_fix'-patch incorporated, it doesn't suffice. This may - later - lead to the re-involvment of the 'nfs-kernel-group', eventually. In the meantime, many thanks for the help - I'll try to do 'my' homework as fast as my time allows. Regards, Ruediger Oberhage - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/