Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964855AbVJZSet (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:34:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964857AbVJZSet (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:34:49 -0400 Received: from c-67-180-160-189.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([67.180.160.189]:5321 "EHLO mtv-vpn-hw-jlan-2.corp.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964855AbVJZSes (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:34:48 -0400 Message-ID: <435FCC36.6000304@engr.sgi.com> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:34:30 -0700 From: Jay Lan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050317 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Helsley CC: Chris Wright , Greg KH , Andrew Morton , LKML , Evgeniy Polyakov , Jean-Pierre Dion , Jesse Barnes , Guillaume Thouvenin , Badari Pulavarty , Ram Pai , CKRM-Tech , Erich Focht , elsa-devel , Gerrit Huizenga , Adrian Bunk , "Chandra S. Seetharaman" , Jay Lan , Erik Jacobson , Jack Steiner Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 00/02] Process Events Connector References: <1130285260.10680.194.camel@stark> <20051026003430.GA27680@kroah.com> <1130288437.10680.236.camel@stark> <20051026012216.GD5856@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <1130290233.10680.262.camel@stark> <20051026014852.GE5856@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <1130292802.10680.283.camel@stark> In-Reply-To: <1130292802.10680.283.camel@stark> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2101 Lines: 61 Matt Helsley wrote: >On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 18:48 -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > >>* Matt Helsley (matthltc@us.ibm.com) wrote: >> >>> It seems to me that this is the consensus here and on LSE-Tech. >>>This patch addresses the needs of ELSA and CKRM and is amenable to using >>>the patches recently proposed on lse-tech to pull out the common piece. >>> >>Sounds good. What about the SGI needs (for PAGG)? They just posted >>pnotify pretty recently. Or is that what you mean by consensus and >>possible use of 'task notifiers'? >> Hi, Jesse is no longer with SGI. Please cc erikj(PAGG & task_notifier) and jlan(CSA) on discussion related to process event notifier. Thanks! - jay >>thanks, >>-chris >> > > If this patch used pnotify it would be much more complicated and it >would need to attach small pieces of data to each task. However there >have been some alternative proposals. The 'task_notifier' patch posted >by Jack Steiner was much closer to what this patch needs: >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lse-tech&m=112869558116290&w=2 > > 'task_notifier' is smaller and easier to review but still requires >per-task data that would complicate the Process Events Connector patch. >There has been some discussion in the above thread on how to address the >per-task data/notification needs of PAGG and the all-task notification >needs of ELSA and CKRM. > >Cheers, > -Matt Helsley > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. >Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course >Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 >Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information >_______________________________________________ >ckrm-tech mailing list >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/