Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964916AbVJZUyi (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:54:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964926AbVJZUyi (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:54:38 -0400 Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.28]:57803 "EHLO smtp2-g19.free.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964916AbVJZUyi (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:54:38 -0400 X-Mailbox-Line: From laurent@antares.localdomain mer oct 26 22:49:09 2005 Message-Id: <20051026204802.123045000@antares.localdomain> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:48:02 +0200 From: Laurent riffard To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Greg KH , Russell King Subject: [RFC patch 0/3] remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 812 Lines: 25 I'm willing to submit patches to remove pci_driver.owner and .name fields. pci_driver.driver.owner and .name will be used instead. Patch 1 prepares the core pci code for future removal of the 2 fields, but actually do not remove them. As suggested by Al Viro, pci_driver.driver.owner will be set by pci_register_driver. Patch 2 is an example of driver's update. There will be lots of patches like this. Patch 3 is the final touch, after all pci_driver.name and pci_driver.owner are removed. Any comments ? Feel free to correct my bad english. thanks -- laurent - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/