Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964985AbVJ0IA7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 04:00:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964988AbVJ0IA7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 04:00:59 -0400 Received: from smtpa1.netcabo.pt ([212.113.174.16]:18662 "EHLO exch01smtp03.hdi.tvcabo") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964985AbVJ0IA7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 04:00:59 -0400 Message-ID: <43608972.6070501@rncbc.org> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:01:54 +0100 From: Rui Nuno Capela User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt CC: William Weston , george@mvista.com, Ingo Molnar , john stultz , Fernando Lopez-Lezcano , Mark Knecht , david singleton , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cc@ccrma.Stanford.EDU Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rc4-rt7 References: <1129852531.5227.4.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <20051021080504.GA5088@elte.hu> <1129937138.5001.4.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <20051022035851.GC12751@elte.hu> <1130182121.4983.7.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <1130182717.4637.2.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <1130183199.27168.296.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <20051025154440.GA12149@elte.hu> <1130264218.27168.320.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> <435E91AA.7080900@mvista.com> <20051026082800.GB28660@elte.hu> <435FA8BD.4050105@mvista.com> <435FBA34.5040000@mvista.com> <435FEAE7.8090104@rncbc.org> <1130371042.21118.76.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1130371042.21118.76.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2005 08:00:51.0264 (UTC) FILETIME=[8C574400:01C5DACC] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1806 Lines: 49 Steven Rostedt wrote: > >>On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Rui Nuno Capela wrote: >> >> >>>Just noticed a couple or more of this on dmesg. Maybe its old news and >>>being discussed already. Otherwise my P4@2.53Ghz/UP laptop boots and >>>runs without hicups on 2.6.14-rc5-rt7 (config.gz attached). >>> >>>... time warped from 13551912584 to 13551905960. >>>... system time: 13488892865 .. 13488892865. >>>udevstart/1579[CPU#0]: BUG in get_monotonic_clock_ts at >>>kernel/time/timeofday.c: >>>262 >>> [] __WARN_ON+0x4f/0x6c (8) >>> [] get_monotonic_clock_ts+0x27a/0x2f0 (40) >>> [] kmem_cache_alloc+0x51/0xac (76) >>> [] copy_process+0x2ff/0xeed (44) >>> [] unlock_page+0x17/0x4a (12) >>> [] do_wp_page+0x245/0x372 (20) >>> [] do_fork+0x69/0x1b5 (56) >>> [] do_page_fault+0x432/0x543 (32) >>> [] sys_clone+0x32/0x36 (72) >>> [] sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75 (16) >> >>[...] > > Also, Rui, do they show up at different times or clustered together? > (William, I see your output is clustered) The reason I asked, is that > the test may produce more than one warning message for the same time > warp. Since the time used to check for the time warp is not updated if > time goes backwards, so if you call the this routine more than once > before the time warp catches back up, it will warn again. > Don't really know if its consistent, but it does occur on several times, on only on boot. Sorry for the delay. -- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela rncbc@rncbc.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/